Discussion of Ambulance Purchase Contract
Vote on Ambulance Purchase Contract
Trustee Vedvik violates Roberts Rules
TID No. 2 Project Plan
Discussion of Ambulance Purchase Contract
Vote on Ambulance Purchase Contract
Trustee Vedvik violated Roberts Rules
Listening to your constituents’ concerns and seeking an Independent Ambulance Service Feasibility Study is not “Obstruction.”
Refraining from Speaking Adversely on a Prior Action Not Pending. “In debate, a member cannot reflect adversely on any prior act of the society that is not then pending …” RONR (12th ed.) 43:24
Refraining from Attacking a Member’s Motives. “When a question is pending, a member can condemn the nature or likely consequences of the proposed measure in strong terms, but he must avoid personalities, and under no circumstances can he attack or question the motives of another member.” RONR (12th ed.) 43:21.
This post is the opinion of David Baker